from small one page howto to huge articles all in one place
 

search text in:





Poll
Which screen resolution do you use?










poll results

Last additions:
using iotop to find disk usage hogs

using iotop to find disk usage hogs

words:

887

views:

196714

userrating:

average rating: 1.7 (102 votes) (1=very good 6=terrible)


May 25th. 2007:
Words

486

Views

252324

why adblockers are bad


Workaround and fixes for the current Core Dump Handling vulnerability affected kernels

Workaround and fixes for the current Core Dump Handling vulnerability affected kernels

words:

161

views:

141294

userrating:

average rating: 1.4 (42 votes) (1=very good 6=terrible)


April, 26th. 2006:

Druckversion
You are here: manpages





SGETMASK

Section: Linux Programmer's Manual (2)
Updated: 2017-09-15
Index Return to Main Contents
 

NAME

sgetmask, ssetmask - manipulation of signal mask (obsolete)  

SYNOPSIS

long sgetmask(void);

long ssetmask(long newmask);

Note: There are no glibc wrappers for these system calls; see NOTES.  

DESCRIPTION

These system calls are obsolete. Do not use them; use sigprocmask(2) instead.

sgetmask() returns the signal mask of the calling process.

ssetmask() sets the signal mask of the calling process to the value given in newmask. The previous signal mask is returned.

The signal masks dealt with by these two system calls are plain bit masks (unlike the sigset_t used by sigprocmask(2)); use sigmask(3) to create and inspect these masks.  

RETURN VALUE

sgetmask() always successfully returns the signal mask. ssetmask() always succeeds, and returns the previous signal mask.  

ERRORS

These system calls always succeed.  

VERSIONS

Since Linux 3.16, support for these system calls is optional, depending on whether the kernel was built with the CONFIG_SGETMASK_SYSCALL option.  

CONFORMING TO

These system calls are Linux-specific.  

NOTES

Glibc does not provide wrappers for these obsolete system calls; in the unlikely event that you want to call them, use syscall(2).

These system calls are unaware of signal numbers greater than 31 (i.e., real-time signals).

These system calls do not exist on x86-64.

It is not possible to block SIGSTOP or SIGKILL.  

SEE ALSO

sigprocmask(2), signal(7)  

COLOPHON

This page is part of release 4.13 of the Linux man-pages project. A description of the project, information about reporting bugs, and the latest version of this page, can be found at https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/.


 

Index

NAME
SYNOPSIS
DESCRIPTION
RETURN VALUE
ERRORS
VERSIONS
CONFORMING TO
NOTES
SEE ALSO
COLOPHON





Support us on Content Nation
rdf newsfeed | rss newsfeed | Atom newsfeed
- Powered by LeopardCMS - Running on Gentoo -
Copyright 2004-2020 Sascha Nitsch Unternehmensberatung GmbH
Valid XHTML1.1 : Valid CSS : buttonmaker
- Level Triple-A Conformance to Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 -
- Copyright and legal notices -
Time to create this page: 45.1 ms