FLOCK
Section: Linux Programmer's Manual (2)
Updated: 2017-09-15
Index
Return to Main Contents
NAME
flock - apply or remove an advisory lock on an open file
SYNOPSIS
#include <sys/file.h>
int flock(int fd, int operation);
DESCRIPTION
Apply or remove an advisory lock on the open file specified by
fd.
The argument
operation
is one of the following:
-
- LOCK_SH
-
Place a shared lock.
More than one process may hold a shared lock for a given file
at a given time.
- LOCK_EX
-
Place an exclusive lock.
Only one process may hold an exclusive lock for a given
file at a given time.
- LOCK_UN
-
Remove an existing lock held by this process.
A call to
flock()
may block if an incompatible lock is held by another process.
To make a nonblocking request, include
LOCK_NB
(by ORing)
with any of the above operations.
A single file may not simultaneously have both shared and exclusive locks.
Locks created by
flock()
are associated with an open file description (see
open(2)).
This means that duplicate file descriptors (created by, for example,
fork(2)
or
dup(2))
refer to the same lock, and this lock may be modified
or released using any of these file descriptors.
Furthermore, the lock is released either by an explicit
LOCK_UN
operation on any of these duplicate file descriptors, or when all
such file descriptors have been closed.
If a process uses
open(2)
(or similar) to obtain more than one file descriptor for the same file,
these file descriptors are treated independently by
flock().
An attempt to lock the file using one of these file descriptors
may be denied by a lock that the calling process has
already placed via another file descriptor.
A process may hold only one type of lock (shared or exclusive)
on a file.
Subsequent
flock()
calls on an already locked file will convert an existing lock to the new
lock mode.
Locks created by
flock()
are preserved across an
execve(2).
A shared or exclusive lock can be placed on a file regardless of the
mode in which the file was opened.
RETURN VALUE
On success, zero is returned.
On error, -1 is returned, and
errno
is set appropriately.
ERRORS
- EBADF
-
fd
is not an open file descriptor.
- EINTR
-
While waiting to acquire a lock, the call was interrupted by
delivery of a signal caught by a handler; see
signal(7).
- EINVAL
-
operation
is invalid.
- ENOLCK
-
The kernel ran out of memory for allocating lock records.
- EWOULDBLOCK
-
The file is locked and the
LOCK_NB
flag was selected.
CONFORMING TO
4.4BSD (the
flock()
call first appeared in 4.2BSD).
A version of
flock(),
possibly implemented in terms of
fcntl(2),
appears on most UNIX systems.
NOTES
Since kernel 2.0,
flock()
is implemented as a system call in its own right rather
than being emulated in the GNU C library as a call to
fcntl(2).
With this implementation,
there is no interaction between the types of lock
placed by
flock()
and
fcntl(2),
and
flock()
does not detect deadlock.
(Note, however, that on some systems, such as the modern BSDs,
flock()
and
fcntl(2)
locks
do
interact with one another.)
In Linux kernels up to 2.6.11,
flock()
does not lock files over NFS
(i.e., the scope of locks was limited to the local system).
Instead, one could use
fcntl(2)
byte-range locking, which does work over NFS,
given a sufficiently recent version of
Linux and a server which supports locking.
Since Linux 2.6.12, NFS clients support
flock()
locks by emulating them as byte-range locks on the entire file.
This means that
fcntl(2)
and
flock()
locks
do
interact with one another over NFS.
Since Linux 2.6.37,
the kernel supports a compatibility mode that allows
flock()
locks (and also
fcntl(2)
byte region locks) to be treated as local;
see the discussion of the
local_lock
option in
nfs(5).
flock()
places advisory locks only; given suitable permissions on a file,
a process is free to ignore the use of
flock()
and perform I/O on the file.
flock()
and
fcntl(2)
locks have different semantics with respect to forked processes and
dup(2).
On systems that implement
flock()
using
fcntl(2),
the semantics of
flock()
will be different from those described in this manual page.
Converting a lock
(shared to exclusive, or vice versa) is not guaranteed to be atomic:
the existing lock is first removed, and then a new lock is established.
Between these two steps,
a pending lock request by another process may be granted,
with the result that the conversion either blocks, or fails if
LOCK_NB
was specified.
(This is the original BSD behavior,
and occurs on many other implementations.)
SEE ALSO
flock(1),
close(2),
dup(2),
execve(2),
fcntl(2),
fork(2),
open(2),
lockf(3),
lslocks(8)
Documentation/filesystems/locks.txt
in the Linux kernel source tree
(Documentation/locks.txt
in older kernels)
COLOPHON
This page is part of release 4.13 of the Linux
man-pages
project.
A description of the project,
information about reporting bugs,
and the latest version of this page,
can be found at
https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/.
Index
- NAME
-
- SYNOPSIS
-
- DESCRIPTION
-
- RETURN VALUE
-
- ERRORS
-
- CONFORMING TO
-
- NOTES
-
- SEE ALSO
-
- COLOPHON
-